United States v. Lopez - Case Summary and Case Brief United States v Lopez Case Brief Statement of the Facts: Congress made it a federal crime to possess a firearm in a school zone under the Gun Free School Zones Act of 1990 (the “Act”) In 1992, Alfonzo Lopez, Jr , a senior in high school, possessed a concealed handgun within a school zone in Texas He was indicted under the Act
United States v. Lopez | Constitution Center Lopez challenged his conviction, arguing that the law exceeded Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause In a five-to-four decision, the Supreme Court agreed with Lopez and struck down the law
United States v. Lopez | Oyez The act forbids "any individual knowingly to possess a firearm at a place that [he] knows is a school zone " Lopez was found guilty following a bench trial and sentenced to six months' imprisonment and two years' supervised release
United States v. Lopez - Wikipedia United States v Lopez, 514 U S 549 (1995), is a landmark case of the United States Supreme Court that struck down the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 (GFSZA), determining that it was not a valid exercise of Congress 's power to regulate interstate commerce
United States v. Lopez: Case Summary and Ruling - LegalClarity Lopez limited federal power, redefined the Commerce Clause, and restored states' authority over non-economic local issues United States v Lopez (1995) is a Supreme Court decision that re-examined the scope of federal power under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution
United States v. Lopez | | Britannica United States v Lopez, legal case in which the U S Supreme Court on April 26, 1995, ruled (5–4) that the federal Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 was unconstitutional because the U S Congress, in enacting the legislation, had exceeded its authority under the commerce clause of the Constitution
United States v. Lopez – Case Brief Summary - Studicata Case brief summary of United States v Lopez including the facts, issue, holding, and reasoning Written in plain English to help law students understand the key takeaways Read the full case brief at Studicata