What is the difference between kinematics and dynamics? A quick Google search reveals "dynamic and kinematic viscosity," "kinematic and dynamic performance," "fully dynamic and kinematic voronoi diagrams," "kinematic and reduced-dynamic precise orbit determination," and many other occurrences of this distinction What is the real distinction between kinematics and dynamics?
What are the equations for motion with constant jerk? Every one knows the three famous equations for motions with constant acceleration But what if the motion were having a jerk? How should then be the equations for motions? How can I find them?
Difference b w Kinetics Kinematics w concrete example seems to me like "kinematics" analyzes the motion (trajectories etc ), without worrying what is causing the motion While "kinetics" or as most would say "dynamics" does care about what causes motion (namely torques, forces)
How do kinematic equations work regardless of mass of the object? I understand that kinematics is the branch of physics not concerned with forces, but how is it so accurate (provided constant acceleration)? How is it that when figuring out the motion through kinetics (which does depend on the object, e g its mass), you still get the same answers as if it were done through kinematics? P s
日历月历