www. adrforum. com Complainant is Invesco Ltd (“Complainant”), represented by Mary Grace Gallagher of Alston Bird, LLP, Georgia, USA Respondent is Donal Leahy Capital Assets Acquisitions (“Respondent”), Ireland REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAME The domain name at issue is <globalinvesco com>, registered with Everyones Internet, Ltd dba SoftLayer
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM See Invesco Ltd v Premanshu Rana, FA 1733167 (ForumJuly 10, 2017) ("Use of a domain name to divert Internet users to a competing website is not a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use ") The Panel finds that Complainant has satisfied Policy ¶ 4 (a) (ii)
www. adrforum. com See Invesco Ltd v Premanshu Rana, FA1733167 (ForumJuly 10, 2017) ("Use of a domain name to divert Internet users to a competing website is not a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use ");
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM See Herbalife Int’l, Inc v Farmana, D2005-0765 (WIPO Oct 3, 2005) (parking of the domain name for many years constitutes no more than a passive use or de facto activity, which activity can reinforce a finding of no legitimate interest), see also Invesco Ltd v Premanshu Rana, FA 1733167 (Forum July 10, 2017) (“Use of a domain name to
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM See Invesco Ltd v Premanshu Rana, FA 1733167 (Forum July 10, 2017) (“Use of a domain name to divert Internet users to a competing website is not a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use ”) Respondent uses the <authy app> domain to redirect consumers to a competing authenticator app
DECISION - adrforum. com See Navistar International Corporation v N RahmanyForum <cherryind com> not <cherryind com> See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel Admission Virus(Forum bona fideSee Ripple Labs Inc v NGYEN NGOC PHUONG THAOForum bona fide see also, Invesco Ltd v Premanshu RanaForum bona fide
DECISION - ADR Forum Respondent’s use of the at-issue domain name in this manner indicates neither a bona fide offering of goods or services under Policy ¶ 4 (c) (i), nor a non-commercial or fair use of the domain name under Policy ¶ 4 (c) (iii) See Invesco Ltd v Premanshu Rana, FA 1733167 (Forum July 10, 2017) (“Use of a domain name to divert Internet
NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM The Panel finds that this use is not abona fideoffering of goods or services under Policy ¶¶ 4 (c) (i) (iii) ”); see also Invesco Ltd v Premanshu Rana, FA 1733167 (Forum July 10, 2017) (“Use of a domain name to divert Internet users to a competing website is not a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial